Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ilgipper

It’s hard for me to believe that Obama would let the Bush tax cuts expire simply because the Bush tax cuts created a MORE progressive tax system than was in effect under the Clinton taxes. Yes, everyone got a tax break. BUT the biggest tax breaks (in terms of percentages) occurred for those at the bottom — that’s why we have about half the country paying nothing and a good portion of those even receive transfer payments under the “Earned Income Tax Credit,” i.e., they actually have a negative tax.

The Earned Income Tax Credit program was in effect before the Bush tax cut but I believe it was increased pretty heftily under the Bush tax cuts.

I think this is why Obama always just wanted to raise taxes on the so-called “rich” but caved when it came to letting the Bush tax cuts expire. He was unwilling to let the Bush tax cuts expire because it clearly would have been a tax increase on those he’d absolutely promised wouldn’t have their taxes increased. He doesn’t have the ability to veto a portion of a bill, so either all the tax cuts expire or he has to accept or reject the totality of a bill that would revise the taxes.


17 posted on 08/01/2011 11:05:53 AM PDT by SweetWilliamsMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: SweetWilliamsMom

I agree 100%. See my Post #13.


25 posted on 08/01/2011 12:11:07 PM PDT by InterceptPoint (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson