Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aquila48

I’d guess you have not read much regarding either theory based upon your post.

See my prior post on this thread #65 for more info.


67 posted on 08/03/2011 11:44:10 AM PDT by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: BrandtMichaels

I looked at your creationist site looking for a concise statement of the “theory of creationism”. I din’t see one, but I didn’t do a thorough search. Maybe you can point me to it so I can see if it’s falsifiable.

Also does it meet these other criteria?

“A theory is a good theory if it satisfies two requirements: It must accurately describe a large class of observations on the basis of a model that contains only a few arbitrary elements, and it must make definite predictions about the results of future observations.”

Maybe you can comment on it.


69 posted on 08/03/2011 12:08:49 PM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson