[Retired Greyhound]

It's like her endorsing Cheerios and I decide to eat it even though I know it makes me sick. So it's her fault I'm sick. That's the liberal mindset you and the 'anti Sarah' groupies are demonstrating.

But if she KNOWS its poison, and endorses it anyway, then she bears responsibility.

She knew McCain was a loser (especially after getting to know him up-close as his running-mate), and she still pushed him on Arizonans.

To further your ridiculously flimsy analogy, she endorsed a poisonous, defective product unto a small segment of people (Arizonans). The rest of the country didn't have a say, yet we are stuck with the consequences.

[presently no screen name]

But if she KNOWS its poison, and endorses it anyway, then she bears responsibility.

Who said it was poison to her? Didn't I say it makes me sick?

We can go back and forth all day because you SO WANT to push your 'anti SARAH' stance.

Remember - there is no talking sense to a liberal. On that note - my God-given time is valuable. I have things to do that is productive so I'll leave you to wallow around in liberalism because talking/explaining doesn't work on liberals - you just will never see it. You refuse to be accountable - you shown that over and over - it's the other person that must be accountable. Even w/my scenario - I said it makes me sick - even that you blamed on who endorsed the product. That's is base line liberalism. You sue because a 'product blew up due to the fact you pulled the wrong lever' mentality.

[presently no screen name]

She knew McCain was a loser (especially after getting to know him up-close as his running-mate), and she still pushed him on Arizonans.

You are very strong in saying what Sarah knew/knows - when it is very obvious you KNOW S&!T.

You are unable to grasp the 'accountability' concept and well grounded in 'pointing the finger' - traits of liberalism that you have shown consistently here. Exactly what barry, your leader, has done for three years.