See, there you go again.
I take the time to answer your question and I get thanked by you brushing my answer off with the same question.
That is why I consider you insane.
The cameraman being beat in Vegas?
The Cop Hater Mr Rodger demanded I look at his link and admit a small error by the police, so I quickly scanned it. Looked like a small error so I said OK small error.
Is that a big deal?
Yet your very *first*, unsolicited post in #28, in an attempt to immediately discredit the victim, you stated:
Post #28 Berlin_Freeper: This “gentle giant” was convicted for assault with a deadly weapon.
Which you failed to mention this charged occurred 16 years ago.
Then, when asked if you thought this incident was reasonable, based on what we already know, in post 63 you stated the following:
It is kind of ironic that you are so quick to fault the police for using force against a resisting suspect, yet very willing to Troll me for an answer.
My comments were all based on the *story*, witness statements, and what we already know. You were the *first* to discredit the victim in support of the police, on an incident that occurred over *16* years ago.
Ya starting to see a pattern here Mr. Berlin Freeper?