Democrat liberal, marxist, leftest logic is if your spending more than your taking in, You need to take in a whole bunch more.
They have been doing it since the sixties, and it’s worked just fine.
They never cut. Give them 1/2 of what they demand, and that is a 50% cut
No increase, cuts, across the board.
If the elected can not do it, step down. Now
“They never cut”
The humorous thing about Obama’s claim is the implication that if he’d had more revenues he would have spent less. That defies progressive logic. Once you’ve extracted resources from the sheeple, what kind of doofus would ever give it back? Spending under Obama is easy to predict:
S = R x 1.67.
Obama could have inherited a surplus of $500B and he still would have figured out a way to spend it and then some.