Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RandallFlagg
In the guide business, we have a saying about clients wanting to carry a pistol for “protection”. (No matter what size)

We tell then to remove the front sight first. (They look at us quite puzzled.)

We then reply: “That way, it won't hang up on your teeth.”

Deciding to use a Pistol for Bear Protection over a rifle is fool hearty. even the biggest 454 Casul can only kill a bear with a head shot. (Body shots have serious penetration issues) And ever try to hit a grapefruit sized object (Brain) coming at you at over 30 miles per hour, bouncing randomly all over the place?

The heavy caliber rifle is there to break down the front shoulder structure first, to immobilize the animal, followed by a head or neck shot. You are right, that it is not a job for the inexperienced or the ignorant!

73 posted on 07/25/2011 9:43:24 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (Always Remember You're Unique.......(Just Like everyone Else.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: PSYCHO-FREEP

I was only going with what I know, and I know more about pistols than rifles.
He asked me about my weapons, and I replied.
I’ve got him convinced to at least think about it -about it being better to head up into known bear country for hikes and camping armed with something, rather than nothing.

Of course, I have the most effective deterrent against being attacked by bears: Don’t go into their habitat.
Works every time it’s tried.


103 posted on 07/25/2011 10:35:39 AM PDT by RandallFlagg (Let this chant follow BHO everywhere he goes: "You lie. You lie. You lie.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson