Yes, I read the link furnished by “Race Bannon” translated via googletranslate and just posted the excerpt you mentioned. It struck me also.
Here is something overlooked. It might seem minor, but the guy had sympathy for iran and the shia. shia=hizbullah. Against wahabi islam or saudi arabia. THIS is a connection I would jump on with both feet since it was NORWAY that gave asylum to a very high rankng iranian cabinet official who defected to the west that ticked iran off no end.
*****************************************
From Document.no
2009-12-25 09:58:33
I have never understood why the West focus so disproportionately on Iran and so little on the Wahhabi Saudi leadership, which after all is the most dangerous and most powerful Muslim central power. We should, of course, as soon as the bombing suspect their facilities but otherwise focus much more on Saudi. Could it be something that Iran is not a major oil exporter?
Shias make up a relatively small proportion of Muslims and has absolutely no influence on the Sunnis.
I would actually argue that we undermine our own interests by unilaterally attacking the only relatively weak alternative to Sunni Islam. If Iran falls to Wahhabi position strengthened considerably, since they have no competitors.
We should not forget that Saudi Arabia and several other Sunni Muslim countries want to destroy Iran. Nor is Iran that has built 300-500 Wahhabi centers around around Europe of the finances only 2 of 30 Jihad Fronts around the around the world.