Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MSF BU; Monitor
As Monitor correctly observed upthread:

There is no moral, logical, ethical, or theological reason for non-home owners to subsidize the homes of others, and I’m a home owner. It is theft, pure and simple.

59 posted on 07/20/2011 7:36:24 PM PDT by Notary Sojac (I have not heard a single Michele or Cain backer threaten to stay home if Palin is nominated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: Notary Sojac

I will go along with eliminating the mortgage interest deduction so long as w eliminate the interest expense deduction your landlord receives for the business loan he has on your apartment unit. Of course, ykur rent would necessarily go up, but then you would also be paying your fair share.


85 posted on 07/20/2011 9:00:36 PM PDT by CharacterCounts (November 4, 2008 - the day America drank the Kool-Aid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: Notary Sojac

Eh, well let’s stop “subsidizing” college degrees first, especially those zero value added degrees that don’t prepare anyone for future employment. If we’re going to eliminate subsidies, let’s eliminate the ones that are direct payments first, as opposed to tax credits geared toward promoting productive ends. Another credit that we could look at eliminating are those for local and state taxes. Why should people from low tax states subsidize those from high tax states?


96 posted on 07/21/2011 5:29:40 AM PDT by MSF BU (YR'S Please Support our troops: JOIN THEM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson