Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Notary Sojac

I cannot, as a conservative argue with the observation that the government sticking their fingers into anything tends to throw it out of whack, and you are correct.

I counterbalance that with the concept that taxing something decreases that behavior (which is what removing the mortgage deduction would effectively do with home ownership) while the opposite effect occurs when decreasing taxes.

All in all, here we are today, and increasing taxes on people buying houses will make it harder for people to do so.


17 posted on 07/20/2011 4:54:26 PM PDT by rlmorel ("When marching down the same road, one doesn't need 'marching orders' to reach the same destination")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: rlmorel
the concept that taxing something decreases that behavior

Exactly, and the purpose of taxes should be to raise that amount of money the government needs for its legitimate functions, not to modify the behavior of the public.

I think we can politely agree to disagree. Cheers!!

20 posted on 07/20/2011 4:58:53 PM PDT by Notary Sojac (I have not heard a single Michele or Cain backer threaten to stay home if Palin is nominated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: rlmorel

And of course there is the intended effect that the political class wants: fewer homeowners which in turn destabilizes communities and impedes the development of strong families.


24 posted on 07/20/2011 5:02:16 PM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson