To: wagglebee
It's what Margaret Sanger was all about: Maximum number of abortions to get rid of as many undesirables as possible. Genocide before Hitler did it with Zyklon B gas and ovens.
To: twister881
Sanger was not really in favor of abortion, but birth control. An abortion was dangerous in the days before antibiotics. However, she would have been pleased by the results,/b> of Roe v. Wade. Except that she really hoped that the ruling class would step up and have more children. Instead they have almost made it a point of pride NOT to have many children.
7 posted on
07/20/2011 4:24:07 PM PDT by
RobbyS
(Pray with the suffering souls.)
To: twister881
Sanger was not really in favor of abortion, but birth control. An abortion was dangerous in the days before antibiotics. However, she would have been pleased by the results, of Roe v. Wade. Except that she really hoped that the ruling class would step up and have more children. Instead they have almost made it a point of pride NOT to have more than two children and downright shameful to have five or six. A shrinking human population has become an end in itself.
9 posted on
07/20/2011 4:27:15 PM PDT by
RobbyS
(Pray with the suffering souls.)
To: twister881
Sanger was not really in favor of abortion, but birth control. An abortion was dangerous in the days before antibiotics. However, she would have been pleased by the results, of Roe v. Wade. Except that she really hoped that the ruling class would step up and have more children. Instead they have almost made it a point of pride NOT to have more than two children and downright shameful to have five or six. A shrinking human population has become an end in itself.
10 posted on
07/20/2011 4:27:22 PM PDT by
RobbyS
(Pray with the suffering souls.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson