Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mlo

I don’t know when they started allowing so much lawyer involvement in the selection process (maybe they always have?) it’s hard to find information. But to hire people to help?


93 posted on 07/10/2011 1:59:09 PM PDT by brytlea (Someone the other day said I'm not a nice person. How did they know?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: brytlea
"I don’t know when they started allowing so much lawyer involvement in the selection process (maybe they always have?) it’s hard to find information. But to hire people to help?"

I don't know. I don't like the idea of professional juries. Professionals would get captured by the legal profession. It would be like a panel of 12 lawyers. There's a reason for a panel citizens.

But I can't think of a reason why the judge couldn't pick the jurors instead of the two sides. The lawyers end up eliminating a lot of quality people. If your client is guilty your not going to want someone too rational. If your case is weak your going to want someone you can sway. If the judge did it he would only have to decide whether someone could be fair and reasonable.

186 posted on 07/10/2011 8:16:51 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson