Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: central_va

If I was DA I would now hesitate before taking an circumstantial case before a jury, making us ALL more vulnerable. It amazes me that Scott PEterson was convicted on his circumstantial case.


Every DA SHOULD hesitate before taking a circumstantial case to trial.

I was surprised when Peterson was convicted. I “know” he did it but to this day there remains nothing tying him to any murder.

I’ve always believed that circumstantial cases are, at best ‘iffy.’ I hope to never serve on a jury deciding a case such as these. When you are talking possible death penalty, I’d like to have actual proof of guilt rather than just knowing “in my gut” that the person is guilty.


234 posted on 07/11/2011 8:40:20 AM PDT by Grunthor (Today, let me say, do or think nothing that Jesus would not do, think or say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]


To: Grunthor

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumstantial_evidence


235 posted on 07/11/2011 9:26:31 AM PDT by brytlea (Someone the other day said I'm not a nice person. How did they know?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson