To: caww
If somebody cannot judge other people, then that should disqualify them from serving on the jury. The purpose of being on jury is to judge the person. Not guilty verdict is also a judgment.
166 posted on
07/10/2011 6:37:16 PM PDT by
Dante3
To: Dante3
If somebody cannot judge other people, then that should disqualify them from serving on the jury. The purpose of being on jury is to judge the person. Not guilty verdict is also a judgment. Yes, and thus that is where I see the greatest flaw in the system. How to determine a jury should be "reformed"...the sooner the better. I understand it wasn't until Tuesday about noon when those who were holding her guilty began to weaken....whatever happened to bring that about it took less then three hours after for all six to fold. Makes one wonder who was leading that charge to find Casey not guilty. There is ALWAYS a leader.
177 posted on
07/10/2011 7:25:15 PM PDT by
caww
To: Dante3
214 posted on
07/11/2011 7:23:41 AM PDT by
brytlea
(Someone the other day said I'm not a nice person. How did they know?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson