Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Diogenesis
Look, if the mandate was changed from how it was proposed before it hit the law, it's inconsequential.

He addressed it, it was changed, no one ever had Gardesil forced on them.

That has been explained by many posters with links to back them up.

Repeating the charge is much like what pissant did with all his crap on the Palin threads, you don't need to be like pissant if you don't like a certain candidate. Work for your candidate, but be truthful about the candidates you don't like and want to work against. It was disgusting what pissant did, he was a blot on this forum.

28 posted on 07/08/2011 4:55:34 AM PDT by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Lakeshark; Jim Robinson; ConjunctionJunction; Al B.; SolidWood; Leisler; greyfoxx39; ...
First, the mandate WAS RINO PERRY's IDEA, so it is an issue.
Proof:
RINO Perry's Chief of Staff worked for Merck
and the Merck company at that time was desperate for cash.


Second, RINO-Perry FOUGHT the change.
Proof:
RINO Perry rejected opponents' and Conservatives' calls to reverse
his mandate


Third, given that YOU support someone who in the past
supported RomneyCARE, ObamaCARE, or MANDATED-DRUGS-by-government,
is it not quite ironic that you project and call anyone else 'pissant'.

29 posted on 07/08/2011 5:09:26 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Nothing surpasses the complexity of the human mind. - Leto II: Dar-es-Balat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson