Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Girlene
Okay, watching a bit of this woman juror’s interview on Nightline.... Says when someone dumps a body like that, it shows your covering up something, but doesn’t show what you’re covering up.

Unbelievable...

She should have kept her face out of view. Now her neighbors know she let Casey Anthony go free.

189 posted on 07/06/2011 9:12:12 PM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Scarpetta

I watched that interview with this woman juror trying to understand the logic/reasoning. I’m open to the fact that they might not have been presented all the evidence that had been made public when depositions, etc. were released some time ago.

But, I kept trying to figure out what it would take for her to determine that a murder or manslaughter had occurred....I never understood what it would take.

I thought the prosecution had painted a scenario of what had happened. She indicated she had no idea what any scenario might be. Wasn’t one presented?

She said some jurors said no way Casey was guilty from the beginning of the deliberations.......that’s quite surprising.

Maybe the prosecution should have acted it out on a doll or something for a jury to be able to visualize what the prosecution was trying to prove.

She didn’t seem to have any idea of a possible motive. Just because someone’s out partying after their daughter is dead doens’t mean they killed their daughter. She conceded it looked bad, but......

These were my impressions after watching this interview.....may have misunderstood some of it, but it had me scratching my head.....


194 posted on 07/06/2011 9:25:34 PM PDT by Girlene (If da trunk don't smell; she's free as he**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson