Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: carola

Proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Saying she must have killed her kid because we can’t think of anyone else that might have done it is not proof. Saying someone “acted guilty” is not proof.

You would be amazed at the emotional instability that sets in on a person once they feel the eyes are watching. People no longer act like you might expect. Even you would act guilty of a crime you knew someone else committed in another State you never even knew if you thought someone was watching you for signs of guilt.


82 posted on 07/06/2011 1:22:57 PM PDT by CodeToad (Islam needs to be banned in the US and treated as a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: CodeToad

No, I would not act guilty if I had not committed a crime just because someone was watching. If I had accidentally and unintentionally killed my child I’d call 911. If my child disappeared I’d call 911. Casey’s child was missing and she didn’t call 911. Instead she went out and partied. That’s because she knew where her child was and she knew she was responsible. She didn’t want anyone else to know. Once the child was disposed of her only problem was keeping her nosy parents out of the picture. Obviously she wasn’t thinking long term, but she was free to have a good time while it lasted.


93 posted on 07/06/2011 2:31:31 PM PDT by carola
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson