So what about the child abuse charge? 31 days of neglect? What reasonable doubt was there for that count?
Please cite the specific evidence that the prosecution presented to the jury of “child abuse”, or even “neglect”(for which she was not even charged)
And by this question, I’m asking for the SPECIFIC evidence the prosecution allegedly presented to the jury....NOT your personal interpretations, or opinions. Please post the factual evidence that was presented that “beyond a reasonable doubt” showed “child abuse”.
Lastly, before you reply, allowing someone else to have care of your child is not “abuse”, nor is not reporting that your child is deceased, evidence of “child abuse”
It all comes down to this: no one knows or can prove how Caylee died. Though I don’t agree with the decision, I do understand how that can raise reasonable doubt.
I also am a firm believer in the natural order of things. If Casey Anthony murdered Caylee, she will not go free of it regardless of what the jury decided.
Exactly!
For evryone who says the prosecution didn’t prove she did it (murder one), what about the neglect, irresponsibility, etc of partying while the child was missing?
She was charged with felony neglect (a lesser charge) and they STILL didn’t find against her...even when her defense team admitted she was culpable!
This is justice?
I don't mean to appear callous, but once the child was dead, no subsequent action or inaction by the mother could be classified as child abuse or neglect. It may be classified as some other crime but that was not charged. While the mother was quite likely guilty of some crime related to the death, the jury could only rule on the charges and evidence presented.