The jury obviously didn't understand the concept of circumstantial evidence and the validity of it. They thought they were actors in a CSI episode, and felt they actually had to see film footage of the incident put up on you tube in order to convict her.
The problem with our electoral system is an uninformed citizenry. The problem with our judicial system is the same.
Interesting speculation. Do you have any evidence besides a differing opinion on the verdict?
The jury obviously didn’t understand the concept of circumstantial evidence and the validity of it.
<><><><<
I have run your statement through a translator, and it came out thusly: “The jury obviously doesn’t understand and use circumstantial evidence in this case like I would have used it.”
Of course, the fact that they were there every day, for every minute of the testimony, and you were, what?, listening to Nancy Grace.