Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: clamper1797
the jury who heard every moment of testimony found her not guilty END OF STORY. Don't blame the jury if the prosecutor did not prove the case.

The jury obviously didn't understand the concept of circumstantial evidence and the validity of it. They thought they were actors in a CSI episode, and felt they actually had to see film footage of the incident put up on you tube in order to convict her.

The problem with our electoral system is an uninformed citizenry. The problem with our judicial system is the same.

17 posted on 07/06/2011 8:27:11 AM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: concerned about politics

Interesting speculation. Do you have any evidence besides a differing opinion on the verdict?


23 posted on 07/06/2011 8:41:28 AM PDT by FourPeas ("Maladjusted and wigging out is no way to go through life, son." -hg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: concerned about politics

The jury obviously didn’t understand the concept of circumstantial evidence and the validity of it.

<><><><<

I have run your statement through a translator, and it came out thusly: “The jury obviously doesn’t understand and use circumstantial evidence in this case like I would have used it.”

Of course, the fact that they were there every day, for every minute of the testimony, and you were, what?, listening to Nancy Grace.


76 posted on 07/06/2011 9:49:12 AM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson