[PeanutbutterandJellybean]

So is this going to boil down on how a juror defines the word, reasonable? Kind of reminds me of, “depends on what the meaning of is, is.” Yes, the case was short on forensic evidence, but someone please explain on how Anthony didn't even get charged with child neglect when her two year old was missing for a month before she reported it? The mere fact that a two year old toddler is missing for an entire month while mommy is out having a grand time, isn't a big red flag that something is terribly wrong? Yesterdays verdict was a travesty of justice.

[stuartcr]

Isn’t it supposed to boil down to the jurors?

[ArrogantBustard]

So is this going to boil down on how a juror defines the word, reasonable?

Yes, as it has always been.

The ultimate definer of doubt, and reasonable, and proven when the government puts you on trial for terrorism (you Tea Party scoundrel!) will be 12 of your fellow citizens in a sealed room.

[fso301]

someone please explain on how Anthony didn't even get charged with child neglect when her two year old was missing for a month before she reported it?

I always thought prosecutors held back from throwing every charge at a defendant for just this type situation.

Does anything prevent the State from now pursuing such carge against her?