That’s what I thought. No one can say she murdered that child for sure, even tho she was behaving despicable after the fact.
I thought the prosecutions scenario was horrid until I listened to the defense refute much of it. I was appalled that the state could manufacture a narrative based on speculation. Scary indeed.
What a shame, but watching these talking heads explode, who think they’re so smart, is kind of interesting.
I believe the whole package (the chloroform, dthe duct tape, the partying, etc.) crushed reasonable doubt, made it so that any story that didn’t start with a murder got to be pretty ludicrous. That said, I can’t blamethe jury for not seeing it that way.
It’s as sure as the sun coming up tomorrow that she did it. But it’s also a fact that the prosecution didn’t get it done. Maybe they never could have.
She acted just like she murdered her child.