Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

“This wasn’t a First Amendment case, it was a parents’ rights case”

BS


3 posted on 07/05/2011 2:00:00 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: trumandogz

After seeing what the Socialists, homos and Muslims did with free speech in Europe and Canada in the name of “stopping hate”, looks to me like the judges are being real clear that no government body has the right to control speech in the US. Our international socialists were all set to slam that hate speech nonsense through in the US.

You could hear in Ms. Lindsay Graham’s squeeky voice when he said that there ought to be a law preventing a minister from buring a Koran. Petraus agreed. They did not mention whether burning bibles and putting crosses in piss should be legal. Then Palin denounces the Supreme Court for not banning the hate speech she hates - the wacky military funeral protestors.

No one wants to take personal responsibility anymore for the tolerance necessary to live in a free society. Tolerance is ultimately tested when we have to hear social and political speech we do not like or agree with in public.

Political correctness where the elite of politics, business, social institutions and media team up to pick and choose what hate speech will tolerated and what hate speech won’t be tolerated, is a curse on our freedom and causes all kinds of confusion about tolerance and free speech. The Supreme Court is straightening that confusion out.


19 posted on 07/05/2011 2:33:01 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson