Replies

Ok, first of all, I said I didn’t follow the CASE closely from 2008 until now....If I said “trial”, please forgive me as the TRIAL didn’t start until a month or so ago and I said I didn’t follow it AT FIRST...but after seeing how things got started, I began to..... I also admitted that I missed parts of the meter reader story and asked for clarification on that. I also said that I was a little confused on the number of chloroform searches....

You then say that I asked for A LOT of clarification on basic facts. Well, if 2 things = A LOT in your opinion, then ok....but most people don’t see it that way, so please don’t misrepresent what I said. You also said that FReepers were happy to oblige. Really? No one ever answered the meter reader question, unless I somehow missed it. Would you mind pinging me to the post because it isn’t showing up on my “ping” page and I have just now gotten a response about the 84 searches, until a few minutes ago, though, no one had answered. So I think you may have mixed up the questions that I asked with someone else. If not, again, feel free to point me in the right direction.

I also do not believe that I presented any evaluations that I may have regarding the strengths/weaknesses of the state’s case as superior to others, as a matter of fact, I very openly stated a couple things I thought were weaknesses presented questions for me BECAUSE I missed some of the info (meter reader)....

I understand that people will disagree with me & with the jury, and with a lot of other people. That’s not what bothers me. The attack on the jury bugs me. The people telling others where they find pictures of the jury & even the identities of some, when they made it clear they don’t want to be identified yet, bothers me. The fact that those jury members will be hounded & death threats made on them & their families bother me. That is NOT America and it messes with the very foundations that our nation was built on.

And just because one watched every minute of the trial & followed the case so closely, doesn’t mean they all agree. There are several who actually agree with the jury. So your whole premise, there, is incorrect.

Yes, my understanding of your posts - and I could be wrong, I am not going back to check 2600+ posts - was that you said you did not follow the TRIAL that closely. I read FReepers' answers to questions posed by you and I also saw some people go off on you. I do know as pings fly back and forth answers are passed the original poster, etc., so maybe some questions/answers were posed THROUGH you and not TO you. So, as you say, it is quite possible I could have mixed up someone's questions with yours. My memory is that you asked many questions, as have I, and my memory is usually pretty good. But again, I am NOT wading through 2,600 posts to prove a point.

As for the rest of your post, I don't think my initial premise was wrong at all. Obviously you don't agree, and that is fine. But you commented and I answered and that's the name of the game around here.