Replies

Counts Four Through Seven, Giving False Information to a Law Enforcement Officer in Reference to a Missing Person:

THESE are the charge that she was convicted of? Lieing to LEO about her missing child? So the jury believed what? That she knew her child wasn't missing.....that she had a dead body in the back of her car while blaming Zanny the Nanny? That she had no idea where her child disappeared, but it wasn't Zanny the Nanny? This makes no sense.

Could they only convict her about not really working at her job for the last two years lie that LEO caught her in when they actually took her to the job site?

Is that it?????!!!!!! They convicted her of admitting a lie, but couldn't convict her of murder, neglect, whathaveyou because she didn't actually admit it?

Girlene:

I've watched your well-thought out, reasoned posts for over a week now. I see you attempting to apply fairness yet desperately struggling to make sense out of this travesty.

Read the juror profiles. If you do not wish to find the jury stupid and lazy (BTW, I have no problem with it) consider the fact that they were probably all democrats, i.e., anti-death penalty. Perhaps they chose to deny the facts and evidence in front of them in an effort to spare her life.

Justice for Caylee just didn't fit their agenda.