“Are you talking about the unethical sleazy attorney who won at all cost by throwing out a lie with no evidence to back it up?!”
I understand your frustration, and I am not defending defense attorneys (or this particular one), but coming up with a strategy, any strategy that can get their client off is what their job is. We would like to think that their job is to assist the prosecution in finding the truth, but under our system this is not what they are asked to do. It’s a flawed system, but it’s the best one we have.
The jurors heard that and decided a case on a LIE from a sleazy unethical piece of crap according to the alternate juror. Is that what our justice system has come to? REALLY?!