As I have said, I do care to point out "professional" talking heads who are often wrong in their opinions.
You don't disagree with that do you?
No, I don't disagree. But I do believe in the two way street, as you seem to also. The author made a point of saying that those who predict she will not run (or win the nomination, or win the presidency) "have some explaining to do" if she indeed does run/win/win. I don't think they should be castigated for having an opinion at this time, but those who are continually wrong in those predictions should be taken less seriously in the future. On the flipside, if she does not run/win/win, then those who have predicted such should be similarly discounted. The folks who told us Rudy was a shoe-in should be given little attention, IMO. Those who said McCain would win (or would take California, LOL) should also be discounted. But when you do this, FoxNews, MSNBC (and the rest) would be left without commentators. That might be a good thing. Perhaps we could get back to real news instead of blabber from talking heads. JMHO