This is the part I absolutely love the most. The Marxists that populate the NY Times speaking in defense of the Constitution are like the Devil speaking in defense of the Bible.
Doom on these hypocritical bastards.
I thought these people were educated? What part of “illegal” don’t they get?
NY Times is saying only one race breaks our immigration laws.
NY Times is racist.
The libs who cry about this think nothing of it when they themselves are asked to provided ID while traveling in a foreign country. It's expected -- one shows one's papers and without blinking an eye. But asking folks to show some ID here in America?! Heaven forbid. "Racist."
What a crock of outright lies...
“They give new powers to local police untrained in immigration law.”
Police work is called law enforcement for a reason. The police are pretty good at dealing with criminal activity. These illegal immigrants in their first act as they begin their new lives in the US by breaking US law. Why should we encourage people willing to do that?
There are literally thousands of people lining up to get into the US legally. Why should they bother to be suckers? What is the incentive for these law-abiding people to immigrate the right and legal way? Pandering to illegal immigrants lessens respect for the laws of our country, cheapens the value of citizenship and is destructive to our values as Americans.
I am in favor of more legal immigration and would like to see it easier for immigrants to become legal American citizens. But I have no sympathy for illegal immigrants who believe they are entitled to the benefits that should only be provided to American citizens.
My disgust with the NY Times continues to increase unabated.
The New York Times loves to prove what a traitorous and despicable America hating Marxist rag sheet it is everyday.
This is just the NYT crying big, fat crocodile tears over a favored demographic of fence-jumpers who split 70/30 Democrat whenever they can slide into a voting booth.
You don't see them crying over Chinese and Cubanos who vote Republican when they get their papers, if they do.
What “race” is the NYT inferring to constitute the majority of illegal aliens in the US?
Hispanics are considered to be Caucasians. I guess that leaves only the illegals who are Asian or Negro.
Just another example where the “race card” is being used by idiots who don’t have a clue.
Racist laws against illegals ping!
NYT Wisdom: ‘We all were illegals once’
‘This country was built by illegals’
The New York Times sets the standard for all other traitors.
NY Slime: “We can’t have law enforcement acting like Gestapo against illegals. No, that’s only OK when a 95-year-old American woman in a wheelchair, dying of cancer, has to take off her adult diaper. Or a 7-year-old American girl is groped until she cries.”
NY Times hate laws they must want people to live like animals.They need to look at California it doesn’t work.
Substitute “potential terrorist or cartel hit man” for “undocumented.” Then the stupidity of the entire editorial really shines through.
To the NY Crimes, every measure taken to protect the country is always racist, so....do it anyway. If the effete NY cocktail crowd hates it, all the better.
“Arizona’s attempt to engineer the mass expulsion of the undocumented, no matter the damage to the Constitution,...”
This is how you know there is going to be a war in this country. This “interpretation” of the constitution is literally deranged.
And worse, these undocumented workers will flee into the night or cower in fear, preventing them from getting to the polls to vote for President Obama. This entire scheme is about voter turnout suppression of a vital bloc of the Democratic Party.
Seems like good strategy for a political party platform. I'd vote for it.
This is the part I absolutely love the most. The Marxists that populate the NY Times speaking in defense of the Constitution are like the Devil speaking in defense of the Bible.
Doom on these hypocritical bastards.
“I hate newspapermen. They come into camp and pick up their camp rumors and print them as facts. I regard them as spies, which, in truth, they are.”
General William T. Sherman