Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AndyJackson

I can have no objection to the observations.
***Then you are the one who’s the damned liar here. It is obvious that you know much of the physics, and therefore you know that those 14,000 observations are in direct contradiction of modern “laws” of physics. Therefore, any theory that explains the direct contradiction will directly contradict some current holding of modern physics.

You are the charlatan here.


130 posted on 07/04/2011 11:26:16 PM PDT by Kevmo (Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldn't make any sense at all. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]


To: Kevmo
Have you done one of those 14,000 experiments? Do you know what was observed? Can you explain it?

Violation of charge conservation, violation of conservation of energy, violation of detailed balance, violation of Maxwell's equations and principles of quantum mechanics. And you believe it all without doing the experiment yourself and all the follow up experiments.

Just do one piece of one of those experiments that demonstrates just one of those violations and come up with a reasonable explanation and you will have a Nobel Prize on your hands.

Continue arguing in this conspiratorial vein and you will be called a fool, a dupe and a goddamned liar by the entire professional scientific community.

Despite claiming to be an engineer you obviously aren't one of those either. Even a sanitary engineer knows that shit flowing through a pipe is conserved, but you don't understand shit to put it in a nutshell.

132 posted on 07/05/2011 5:37:28 AM PDT by AndyJackson (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson