So if you were on a jury, you would vote to convict a man you knew to be innocent, given the right set of circumstances?
I know when someone starts a paragraph with the word "So", that they are about to put words in my mouth that I did not say or imply. I'm not on the jury and if called I would recuse myself because, unlike you, I presume the socialist bastard is guilty.
He's guilty, self admittedly, of being a socialist. O.J. is a murderer but I am just as pleased that he is imprisoned for armed robbery.
You’re going to have to explain this to more than freepers. You will have to explain this to God.
Your analogy is flawed. You said you hoped S-K was convicted of a crime he did not commit. OJ committed armed robbery and was convicted of same. There is no indication the jury wrongly convicted an innocent man.
You should not be pleased to see the justice system convict any man who is innocent of the crime he is accused of.