Posted on 06/30/2011 6:38:18 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
By consent I mean......
“Hey I met you two minutes ago, and I want to have rough ass sex with you until you bleed and not pay you anything, and be done and checking out within 26 minutes,is that OK?” and she says “Yes.”.
I don’t know of any women who would consent to such things, and I am not that interested in meeting them - but if you say 28 minutes is plenty of time - I will take your word for it.
In post-feminazi Puritan Hamerica obsessed with crimes involving sex, the male is always guilty, even before a crime is committed. I know, I have to walk my dog past a schoolyard. If we go in the other direction, I have pass a park full of innocent children targeted by sexual predators like me and every Catholic priest, doncha know.
Such obsessions cross the political lines, which is the last thing perhaps that unites us all Americans. Let us sing Kumbaya with our DU brethren, shall we?!
I thought there were a number of women who came forth with the same story about his behavior.
I thought there were a number of women who came forth with the same story about his behavior.
Oh I see. So if a guy ever lies to a woman to get to have sex with her it’s rape?
So a when a guy says, “Hey baby I love you and no I won’t leave right when I’m done”...he’s really raping the dumb woman who agrees to have sex with him.
Is it also rape if a man promises to have great sex with a woman and rough sex, but then just has straight sex leaving the woman unsatisfied?
When needing to satisfy a woman sexually becomes the law I think we all will be going to jail.
If you want ass sex and she consents to vaginal sex - and you shove it in and make her bleed - guess what Einstein? - you just committed rape.
It isn't a matter of satisfying her - it is a matter of getting consent for a type of sex that is going to make her bleed.
Anal sex without lubricant is a bloody mess - no doubt.
I am incredulous that any woman would consent to such an encounter - and his past with women makes it seem unlikely that he would wait for such consent.
If she had a few thousand dollars of his money in her pocket when it was all said and done I would accept that it was consensual and negotiated and conducted and concluded in less than 28 minutes. But he claims (now that there is DNA) that she said yes to the sex.
When a woman consents to sex that isn't a “no going back now” consent to do whatever you want to do to her - including things too disgusting to even get a professional to consent to do for pay.
Just because you are incredulous about it doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen.
I’m actually more incredulous about some the garbage we are finding out about this woman. I find consenting to ass sex to be least surprising thing on her rap sheet.
LOL!!! That is most certainly true! Truth is stranger than fiction, because fiction has to make sense.
The entire “I lied about gang rape to get asylum - but I am telling the truth now” is just horrid. She is really really stupid. Once you commit to a lie like that, you have to stick to it. Not like anyone could prove it didn’t happen. Evidence doesn’t work that way. Now that she has admitted to being willing to lie on official documents and in official testimony for asylum, for housing, to avoid taxes......
What will you not lie about lady? And just how much perjury do you want to admit to before asking us to take your word against the head of the IMF?
That this woman is this stupid and this shady shows me that this is officially NOT a set up - ‘they’ would have done a better job if it was a set up. This was just stupidity.
Here we go. Mr. Nasty getting his cookies off on FR. Potty talk at its best.
She’s been working at the hotel for three years, and this is her first scam? HELLO. and her friends were low grade drug dealers who used her identity to launder drug money, not high grade CIA operatives.
Sorry, I’ve treated a lot of rape victims, and unless she is a hooker like the Duke/LaCrosse accuser, or someone he picked up at a bar, like the accusers in the Subic rape case or the Kennedy Smith case, he has problems.
No, she’s getting slimed to get the guy off. There is no excuse for him to have sex with a hotel employee, even if she took all her clothes off for him and tried to seduce him. All he would have to do is call the front desk for help.
His story is that nothing happened, and then the DNA came back and he changed HIS story.
the “best case” scenerio is sexual harassment, since he was a VIP, she might see his attempt to seduce her as having the implication is that if she didn’t give in, he’d get her fired.
if he insisted on Sodomy and she is HIV positive, then he is in danger of catching HIV from her blood...
that would serve him right...
You seem to be a day late and a dollar short. Check out my posts #91 and #93. This woman has committed multiple crimes and lied repeatedly about a host of issues, including committing perjury.
Sorry, I’ve treated a lot of rape victims, and unless she is a hooker like the Duke/LaCrosse accuser, or someone he picked up at a bar, like the accusers in the Subic rape case or the Kennedy Smith case, he has problems.
His problems have been mitigated after learning more about the alleged victim. In case you haven't heard, the state has done an about face and released DSK on his own recognizance without bail. The prosecutors freely admit that the case is a real mess and prosecution will become more difficult.
No, she’s getting slimed to get the guy off. There is no excuse for him to have sex with a hotel employee, even if she took all her clothes off for him and tried to seduce him. All he would have to do is call the front desk for help.
She is getting "slimed" by the PROSECUTION. Read the letter from the DA's office.
After the incident, the letter says, she proceeded to clean another room and then returned to Strauss-Kahn's room to clean it before then going to report the incident. Is this normal for someone who has just been raped? Did she return to the DSK suite to plant evidence? She also made a call to her fiance in prison to discuss how much money she could obtain from the alleged rape.
You are defending the indefensible. This is a reprise of the Duke lacrosse case. A rush to judgment against the rich white guy who allegedly rapes a poor minority woman. The more we learn about this woman, the more this looks like a setup. Unfortunately, the woman didn't realize exactly who this guy was and the attention it would bring.
Don’t put away the noose yet. Most of us were ready to string up this sleaseball because of the other incidents. The “maid” merely confirmed a pattern already shown to exist.
The French writer who just announced that she will sue him because of his assault on her ten years ago is just the tip of the iceberg.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.