Replies

. . . as Freeper Yossarian points out, [0] is apparently ineligible to become Secretary-General.

And of course, 0 has always been such a strict observer of eligibility requirements. ;)

First he understands Obama as a narcissist which informs all his behavior from childhood through this administration.

Not to quibble, but his childhood includes this administration.

Obama is a Marxist

I think more that 0 is a cynical pragmatist who embraces Marxism only because it advances himself to do so. He understands he could never advance in the conservative or libertarian camp on his own dubious merit, and therefore must fly the flag which empowers him as a minority. Once he gets where he wants to go, or if it ever hindered his progress, 0 would throw Marxism into the dustbin as readily as he does any 'close adviser' who becomes a liability.

the narcissism of Obama individually and leftists generally [The left presumes] that in the end days after the destruction of the United States they will prevail over Islam.

The left would do well to consider the experience the Weimar Republic had with trying to leverage an ideology to bring down a governemnt. It couldn't control the result in 1917, and the left will not be able to control the result, if they get what they hope for, in 20XX.

I think more that 0 is a cynical pragmatist who embraces Marxism only because it advances himself to do so. He understands he could never advance in the conservative or libertarian camp on his own dubious merit, and therefore must fly the flag which empowers him as a minority. Once he gets where he wants to go, or if it ever hindered his progress, 0 would throw Marxism into the dustbin as readily as he does any 'close adviser' who becomes a liability.

It is ironic that it is the left that periodically publishes psychiatric profiles of Republican and conservative candidates to demonstrate their unfitness for public trust because of their mental deficiencies. I believe an empirical investigation into the motivations which impel leftists to become what they are would be a far more fruitful field for the study of man than their junk science analysis of Republican candidates.

My own theory goes right to the subject's narcissism. I often use the analogy of the Skinner Box to illustrate the principle. Skinner demonstrated that he can control animals in a box of his design by rewarding them with pellets for desirable behavior. He even succeeded in getting chickens to play baseball by this method. In a sense Skinner was the God over what went on in his box. It is the primordial urge in mankind which is so vividly described in Genesis to play God which motivates man toward statism. What better box in which to play God than the entire apparatus of the federal government unless, of course, it is rule of the world by one world government?

So Obama is a God player and the solipsism invests him with a feelings of omniscience and omnipotence which we have heard him utter, for example, when he told Harry Reid, "I have a gift." His tolerance of children singing songs to him as though he were Chairman Mao is utterly damning of his psychic condition.

A reading of Whittaker Chambers reveals an insight into the mind of communist apparatchiks which is thoroughly frightening. But one characteristic which I find interesting is the separation between the leaders and useful idiots. Clearly Obama who has been a loner all his life regards himself as a leader who despises the rest of his own party as useful idiots.

This is what I was trying to allude to in the last paragraph of my last post. Stalin must destroy Trotsky. Leftist radicals must eventually destroy or be destroyed by their provisional allies the Islamic fundamentalists. Finally, the Democratic Party-or at least the leaders- must turn on itself like a pack of ravening dogs.

Obama sees himself as the top dog.

"The left would do well to consider the experience the Weimar Republic had with trying to leverage an ideology to bring down a governemnt. It couldn't control the result in 1917, and the left will not be able to control the result, if they get what they hope for, in 20XX."

Not to be picky, but the Weimar Republic didn't come into existence until 1919. In 1917 Germany was an imperial monarchy ruled by Kaiser Wilhelm. The Weimar republic was created by a national assembly. I'm not sure what you mean by leveraging an ideaology to bring down a government concerning the German republic created from the ashes of WWI. Are you perhaps somehow referring to the Bolshevics in Russia?

. . . as Freeper Yossarian points out, [0] is apparently ineligible to become Secretary-General.

Maybe that is when he will reveal his true Birth Certificate showing his Kenyan birth and therefore making him eligible.