Yes we DO know what the DA thinks, because there was a decision rendered.
He or she saw the same video we did. There was no interference. And that was the ruling. Period.
The reason for the arrest was interference. There was none, and that is why the charges were dismissed.
Until you let that reality sink into your skull, you are wasting my time.
Please, spare me any more of your stupid posts.
The DA’s exact words were, “we couldn’t make out the elements of the crime charged. That is not lawyer speak for, the girl didn’t do it. That is lawyer speak for, “she may have done, but we can’t see it.”
The justice system rarely declares anybody innocent of anything and there’s no exception in this case either.