Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: citizen
Tis is the California "too violent video game" thing.

It affected only minors, but apparently the USSC by a 7 to 2 vote decided minors could play whatever video games they wanted (without the merchant being prosecuted and fined).

Now that doesn't mean a parent can't deal with the problem, just that California can't. But, of course, California has lots of things it can't deal with ~ budget, debt, illegal aliens, gangs, ~ a portent? Perhaps!

8 posted on 06/27/2011 7:49:39 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah

Also this would not mean that a private retailer could not implement a restrictive policy in his or her own business.


12 posted on 06/27/2011 7:52:19 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Hawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: muawiyah
...circumcision, goldfish, mops...
37 posted on 06/27/2011 8:07:54 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: muawiyah

Here’s a crazy idea: How about make parents responsible for their children’s entertainment choices rather than the government.


40 posted on 06/27/2011 8:11:41 AM PDT by Thane_Banquo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson