I like how you don’t debate any other points except your own narrow view which you base off anecdotal evidence, and support the same idea as liberals that society trumps the U.S. Constitution in deciding Supreme Court cases.
I personally am an absolutist, you obviously are not.
What point haven’t I addressed? I could name about six points that I have raised that haven’t been addressed at all by anyone who has disagreed though.
And I have never said that any law that society makes trumps the Constitution. I have said that there is no Constitutional violation in the CA law in this case.
You are resorting now to creating straw man arguments and accusations that are unfounded.
I will raise some points again and lets see if you honestly address them.
If we are not allowed to have a right to representation on restricting societies children from access to violent video games then why is alright to restrict them from pornography?
If they have a Constitutional right as you claim to violent video games then why not pornography as well?