Replies

I actually think the MSM has gone easy on
Bachmann up to this point. I think they want her to take Iowa and maybe New Hampshire so that THEN they can destroy her and throw the Republicans into chaos. This plan will backfire though, because that is when Sarah will jump in and take everything.

I take the woman's legislative history, resume, public statements and see if the narrative makes sense. See if her rhetoric matches her reality. Then I look for the parts I think are missing, both experience wise as well as the personal story.

I have already seen obfuscation regarding the foster children. When asked how long the children stayed with her she said "It varied". Then said they haven't discussed it so the children can maintain their privacy. I call BS. There is nothing that keeps Mrs. Bachmann from saying child A spent x to xx, etc, etc. If her supporters on this thread believe the MSM is going to settle for this as an answer, they are crazy.

I ask the questions we should all be asking of all our candidates. We better vet them, because we know damned sure the MSM/Dems will. This election is too important to just select a candidate, then have "Surprise".

I make no apologies for asking the hard questions the Bachmann/Palin sycophants/haters refuse to ask. Believe me, they will be asked at some point.

I think they want her to take Iowa and maybe New Hampshire so that THEN they can destroy her and throw the Republicans into chaos. This plan will backfire though, because that is when Sarah will jump in and take everything.

In another thread I said "I'm sure she's on the verge of announcing ~~this week~~ ~~July Fourth~~ ~~July 27th~~ ~~by September 12th~~ ~~14th~~ ~~22nd~~ err ... by November ~~2011~~ 2012."

I was kidding but now I see you suggesting she might jump in after the primaries have started!