Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wastedyears; little jeremiah; xzins; wagglebee
I’ll go with ignorant of the law, with a preference for starting with a clean slate.

Well take some time and educate yourself. We are facing a moral crisis in the Country and this decision by the NY legislature will have national implications. It will also have spiritual ramifications.

Robert Bork wrote a book called "Slouching towards Gomorrah".

Well we have reached that destination.

If, after this fiasco, God fails to judge this nation (or at least New York), then he will need to apologize to Sodom and Gomorrah.

427 posted on 06/25/2011 11:39:15 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies ]


To: P-Marlowe

Even though Wikipedia is at best a suspect source for legal information, it looks to me like the Supreme Court affirmed a law, retracted, then stated the original law to be guidelines.

Last paragraph:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marriage_license#United_States

Looks like the Supreme Court preempted everybody. I wasn’t alive when whichever president decided it was okay for a Supreme Court justice to practice activism.

Putting a minute into thinking about it, almost sounds as if the only contractual part of a marriage license is a social contract, that may or may not be signed, affirming the history of both parties not currently being married at the time of signing the marriage license; the license sounds like a state allowing two people to marry.

If you can clarify anything after sleeping, that’s fine with me. I wouldn’t know where to begin to look for legal information on this subject.


428 posted on 06/26/2011 12:04:21 AM PDT by wastedyears (SEAL SIX makes me proud to have been playing SOCOM since 2003.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies ]

To: P-Marlowe; Admin Moderator; All
FWIW P-Marlowe you have a point. Admin Moderator you also have a point if you do not suspend or ban P-Marlowe. I asked a FReepmail I posted be deleted on another thread (Admin Moderator). I stand by that decision and agreed with your reasoning. P-Marlowe also has a pertinent point with his stand. Asking, by butting in fwiw, for reconsideration Admin Moderator if P-Marlowe is in trouble for stating what was thought. I request I be banned or suspended instead if P-Marlowe is under consideration of being suspended or banned, and by suspending or banning me, P-Marlowe is allowed to stay.
435 posted on 06/26/2011 6:31:56 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson