[don-o]

Here's another slick dehumanization of the unborn: The writer casts a doubt as to whether they are even "here."

Then, there's the tired, old and made up declaration of "reproduction rights." Never forget that that was made up from whole cloth by Roe v Wade. There is no such thing.

[Free Vulcan]

The retread argument that it’s her body. Except it’s not - only half the DNA is hers. Obviously her body didn’t produce something with alien DNA without outside influence.

These things don’t happen spontaneously either. How about exercising a little self control? If you ain’t getting it, he ain’t getting it either.

[delphirogatio]

But it is not the government's right to assume control of any woman's reproduction rights.

But it is a function of government to prosecute those who deprive others of their basic right to life.

And, while I am at it, the government does not seek to control "women's reproductive rights". Even if we can get anti-abortion legislation passed and signed into law, no one will be inhibiting her right to choose whether she uses her reproductive organs.

She just won't get to play tin-god and decide who lives and dies based on convenience.

[Secret Agent Man]

Notice how all “pro-choicers” always talk about it’s not government’s role to interfere with women’s reproductive rights, but they are never pissed when government actively takes a side and funds abortions with taxpayer money? Like that isn’t promoting one side over the other? And then they bitch if government takes away funding for abortions?

If you don’t want government involved, why complain when government stops funding one side? What if all the money government spends for abortions shifted into adoption agencies? Would we see no complaints from “pro-choicers”?

Riiiiight.