No, as I said before, my proposal is to have people who voluntarily choose to accept social welfare benefits be spayed or neutered. If they choose not to accept such benefits then there would be sterilization. There's no "forced" sterilization at all.
How is this any different from Obama's proposal to have death panels or NARAL's proposal to abort more children. Your "proposal" is categorically anti-life, it is IDENTICAL to what Margaret Sanger advocated for decades.
It is fundamentally different because the beneficiaries of the programs are the ones making the choice, not the government or anyone else.
The topic of THIS THREAD is forced sterilization. You have yet to give any indication that you oppose it.
It is fundamentally different because the beneficiaries of the programs are the ones making the choice, not the government or anyone else.
There you go with "choice" again, the other Sangerites were also pleased when so many black women started "choosing" to kill their babies, the "choice" was made easier when Big Murder started building all of the death chambers in inner cities.