This article is apparently in response to the proposal to let the states decide if they want to legalize marijuana.
In that debate, do you want the criteria to be "is it good for you", or do you want it to be "should this be their decision to make, based on the original intent of the Constitution"?
I know how the nanny state bureaucrats in DC want it to be framed, and why, but I'm not inclined to take that bait.
Cold Logic....cool aint it...