To: blasater1960
That's way further than I would have gone in my own federalist ideology. I think her saying it was a state issue was consistent with what our Founders intended. I hope this means she won't impose an non-enumerated federal position on a given state, solely because of her own belief about the given law.
97 posted on
06/21/2011 5:10:47 PM PDT by
Carling
(At some point, those surrounding Obama have to realize that they are working for a psychopath)
To: Carling
That's way further than I would have gone in my own federalist ideology. I think her saying it was a state issue was consistent with what our Founders intended. She is a States Rights Federalist. I am sure she didnt mean to say the Feds should intervene at the State level. Her opinion is clearly that a State should not have the right to force a person to engage in commerce either. I support that position. I dont want the state to force me to buy something I dont want or need.
163 posted on
06/21/2011 9:10:26 PM PDT by
blasater1960
(Deut 30, Psalm 111...the Torah and the Law, is attainable past, present and forever.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson