Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blasater1960
That's way further than I would have gone in my own federalist ideology. I think her saying it was a state issue was consistent with what our Founders intended. I hope this means she won't impose an non-enumerated federal position on a given state, solely because of her own belief about the given law.
97 posted on 06/21/2011 5:10:47 PM PDT by Carling (At some point, those surrounding Obama have to realize that they are working for a psychopath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: Carling
That's way further than I would have gone in my own federalist ideology. I think her saying it was a state issue was consistent with what our Founders intended.

She is a States Rights Federalist. I am sure she didnt mean to say the Feds should intervene at the State level. Her opinion is clearly that a State should not have the right to force a person to engage in commerce either. I support that position. I dont want the state to force me to buy something I dont want or need.

163 posted on 06/21/2011 9:10:26 PM PDT by blasater1960 (Deut 30, Psalm 111...the Torah and the Law, is attainable past, present and forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson