This opens the door to incest as a valid marriage. And anyone who thinks that if we redefine marriage and limit it to two people then that will end polygamy is naive at best. To allow homosexual marriage is to destroy the entire institution of marriage as we know it.
I’m on YOUR side.
Were.
If I read your post correctly you have surrendered to the dark side.
No.
You have either misunderstood or misrepresented what I’ve said.
I CLEARLY said in my post that it would not include members of the same family, citing many legal precedents for this. And yes, classifying marriage between two and only two people will give headaches to the polygamy crowd. And I do not believe the law will permit it. Why? Because they cannot be given PREFERENTIAL treatment. Recognition of polygamy requires that, which is another violation of the equal protection clause. Can you imagine the lawsuits? To recognize polygamy, one must conclude that if each wife has been around for ten years, that EACH of them is entitled, under the law, to draw on the full SS benefits of the husband. Think about that for about 5 minutes.
That will never happen, or we will be broke faster than we are already gonna be broke.
I note that you have not commented on the couple I referenced in my post. Under which part of the Constitution or the Declaration will you stake your claim? Are they entitled to any legal protection of their household or not?
I’m not trying to be coy, but I am trying to make you understand that this is the question the courts will be expected to answer.