Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tobyhill; Dilbert San Diego; Nachum; Alex Murphy; Dr. Bogus Pachysandra; certrtwngnut; 95B30; ...

The end positive of all of this may at the very least be that we are laying the groundwork for future Republican President(s) to be able to repeat the words of the Obammessiah to future Kucinich’s as to why WPR does not constrain America from defending herself in future (yes Wilma, there will be more) war.


122 posted on 06/15/2011 3:09:47 PM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sam_paine

Yes, I agree. Take this to court and let the USSC strike down the War Powers act.


128 posted on 06/15/2011 3:18:57 PM PDT by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

To: sam_paine

This isn’t about the War Powers Act. It’s about the Constitution of the United States of America. The President cannot wage war without Congressional approval. Hamilton was quite clear on that in the Federalist papers. That is what separated us from all other 18th century governments at the time in that the legislature and not the executive could commence a war.


129 posted on 06/15/2011 3:21:10 PM PDT by Hoodat (Yet in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him who loved us. - (Rom 8:37))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

To: sam_paine

Good analysis of the present and seems probable. (Hopefully)


162 posted on 06/16/2011 4:44:25 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson