I agree. All of them did ok and no one prevailed over the pack really. Newt sounded good at the beginning but started in with sharp ugly tone and made some weird statements and sort of imploded. Romney wasn’t as good as his usual BS self but didn’t do badly. Unfortunately romney can play it safe and possibly win the nomination unless he is taken out.
While I like cain’s substance his delivery is uninspiring and he will go nowhere. He was basically invisible on that stage and almost irrelevant. Hate to say that is how it is. I didn’t see any of them as really losing or winning. Even nutjob Paul made good points on economic matters and said some things that needed to be said.
Bachmann probably advanced the most. I thought she started slow but built up. I was impressed and think with some practice she might break out. But pawlenty and romney are grabbing the spotlight and she will need to work hard to get some media hype which would certaiinly help.
Palin ain’t running. If Perry jumps in I think he will gather some steam.
I agree—Romney did well when he countered the argument that Obama used his plan as a template for obamacare. He said—why didn’t he call me? I could have told him what works and what doesn’t—it is a sound argument. Newt did well on his answer to having a muslim working for him. Palin needs to be in the next debate or go back to Alaska—same for Texan, Perry—time to cut bait or get off the pot.