A knight brought it from Palestine, at least that is the most likely story. That doesn’t mean it is the genuine article tho.
It could easily have been sold to that knight by a con man from Jerusalem.
On the other hand, I read the details of the Oxford carbon test and it was clear they were set to prove it was a fake. I would not trust their results at all.
My guess is that it is a fake or maybe genuine but not related to Christ but some other person who was crucified.
It sure would be interesting if someone could prove it was the real burial shroud of Christ. Not sure that could be done and even if it were many would not believe.
Interesting.
I’m sure the debate and controversy regarding the shrould will continue for many years, if not centuries.
In regards to the shroud, it will probably all boil down to the old saying.....
“For non-believers, no explanation is satisfactory.”
“For believers, no explanation is necessary.”