[MHGinTN]

The ‘ultimate evidence’ is the presence of different versions of the same letter, like capital “A” within text supposedly written all on the same typewriter back in 1961. But it really doesn’t matter how much evidence is amassed since the current criminal in the WHite Hut is an affirmative action hire who would bring the democrat party down with him if he were indicted ... the republicant’s will help to protect the bastard because he would upset royally the only thing republicant’s know, which is maintining the status quo. We no longer live in a We The People Republic. We live in a federal oligarchy run by republidems and held up by corrupt courts who will too easily use any excuse to avoid upholding their oath to our now defrauded Constitution.

[onona]

Very sadly, you are right on the money.

[grundle]

The ‘ultimate evidence’ is the presence of different versions of the same letter, like capital “A” within text supposedly written all on the same typewriter back in 1961.

I saw that:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=308397

[Yo-Yo]

The ‘ultimate evidence’ is the presence of different versions of the same letter, like capital “A” within text supposedly written all on the same typewriter back in 1961.

Have you ever actually seen a document typed on a manual typewriter using a fabric ribbon? I went through college typing my papers on one, before there were such things as word processors. (Oh, they were beginning to appear in basic form on computers like Apple IIs or TRS-80s, but most Professors wouldn't accept a paper printed using a dot matrix printer.)

Combining a fabric ribbon with computerized scanning, I can believe all of those letters match.

[Kleon]

The ‘ultimate evidence’ is the presence of different versions of the same letter, like capital “A” within text supposedly written all on the same typewriter back in 1961.

First the proof for forgery was that some of the letters were identical. Now, it's a forgery because they're not?