Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: New Mexico rancher Larry Link murdered by illegal alien
Examiner.com ^ | 6/7/2011 | Kimberly Dvorack

Posted on 06/07/2011 1:44:09 PM PDT by cowpoke

Hidalgo County Sheriff Department has confirmed that New Mexico rancher, Larry Link, was murdered earlier today on his property.

Sources are reporting that the rancher was responding to an alleged- illegal alien on his property at Stein’s Ghost Town when the he was gunned-down. The murder took place on the southwest side of the state near the Arizona border on Interstate 10 at mile marker three.

The Hidalgo Sheriff’s Deputies responded to the scene, only to find the rancher had already died.

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; Mexico; News/Current Events; US: Arizona; US: California; US: New Mexico; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: aliens; border; corruption; crimalien; criminalaliens; democrats; dhs; dhscorruption; dhsdyke; failed; illegalaliens; illegalimmigration; janetnapdyke; mexico; murder; napolitano; rancher; thesystemworked; violence
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-179 next last
To: OldNewYork

Who do they get to sue? Why the gun manufacturer of course, who else?


101 posted on 06/07/2011 4:36:02 PM PDT by itsahoot (We make jokes, they make progress. Progressivism, Support Palin, or get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: relictele

Stock the Rio Grande with Nile crocodiles. They eat humans.


102 posted on 06/07/2011 4:36:22 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cblue55

You need to get in line, no president since Eisenhower gave a cr@p about the borders, and that especially includes the Bush family.


103 posted on 06/07/2011 4:38:06 PM PDT by itsahoot (We make jokes, they make progress. Progressivism, Support Palin, or get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cowpoke

Mexican Cartel or Human Smuggler? Can’t believe a illegal shot him.


104 posted on 06/07/2011 4:38:16 PM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spok

“Napolitano and Obama are responsible for this.”

They are absolutely responsible for this.


105 posted on 06/07/2011 4:40:08 PM PDT by nolongerademocrat ("Before you ask G-d for something, first thank G-d for what you already have." B'rachot 30b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

Sheriffs have more power than most exercise, they need to do all that the law allows. Posses are next best thing to a militia, and they are directly answerable to one man. I think this may only be true where the sheriff is an elected official.


106 posted on 06/07/2011 4:44:36 PM PDT by itsahoot (We make jokes, they make progress. Progressivism, Support Palin, or get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: paguch

Most of the state governors are complicit in this travesty, despite what the say publicly. Remember Napolitino was governor before her current gig.


107 posted on 06/07/2011 4:48:42 PM PDT by itsahoot (We make jokes, they make progress. Progressivism, Support Palin, or get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: wku man
A moat filled with napalm. Claymore mines lining the US side of the moat. Lots of concertina wire. Soldiers and Marines, or better yet, border state militiamen manning 20' tall walls overwatching the mine field, armed with all manner of machine guns and anti-tank weapons. Bradleys, M-1s, Apaches and MLRS on call a few miles back.

There is a line between generosity and progressive liberalism ... and as a Roman Catholic, too many Catholics, including Priests, have forgotten that God is both JUST as well as Merciful. It is UNJUST to condone "illegal immigration" when it means that illegal immigrants take advantage of the USofA, STEAL resources and KILL people.

The Progressive Liberal Priests should VOLUNTEER to go to Mexico to preach their brand of "peace" down there. They think that 'words' will win over murderers. I wanna see it.

I've said it before ... it won't take but a few hours for Mexicans [and other ILLEGALS] to stop crossing the borders if the USofA uses Live Ammo to stop those entering the USofA illegally. WARN THEM VERBALLY first, but then SHOOT TO KILL if they disregard the warning. I'm sorry that people, including women and children, will probably be killed as a result. BUT, I blame Liberalism, including Liberals in the Catholic Church, for condoning this MORTAL SIN which promotes Illegal Aliens breaking the law to enter the USofA.

I'm sorry that there are poor people in Mexico BUT THAT'S NOT OUR PROBLEM. IT'S THEIR OWN GOVERNMENT'S PROBLEM. Their Government won't change until they STAY HOME and FIX IT.

Borders are worthless if they're not protected. EVERY other Country protects its borders and has rules and regulations for immigrants ... but the USofA is 'mean' if we don't????


108 posted on 06/07/2011 4:49:59 PM PDT by HighlyOpinionated (I am a US Citizen, A Patriot, A TEA Partier, An Oath Keeper, A Voter, An Auburn Fan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right
Pardon this very basic question, but can a state still form a state militia?

I'm fully intending to be a smart ass here so...you should already know the answer to that question! Why don't you check your own State's laws and find out for yourself!
Texas Statutes - Chapter 431: STATE MILITIA
Texas Statutes - Section 431.001 DEFINITIONS
(1) "Reserve militia" means the persons liable to serve, but not serving, in the state military forces.
(1-a) "Servicemember" has the meaning assigned by Section 161.551, Health and Safety Code.
(2) "State militia" means the state military forces and the reserve militia.
(3) "State military forces" means the Texas National Guard, the Texas State Guard, and any other active militia or military force organized under state law.
(4) "Texas National Guard" means the Texas Army National Guard and the Texas Air National Guard.

Texas Statutes - Section 431.010: ORGANIZATION PROHIBITED
(a) Except as provided by Subsection (b), a body of persons other than the regularly organized state military forces or the troops of the United States may not associate as a military company or organization or parade in public with firearms in a municipality of the state.
(b) With the consent of the governor, students in an educational institution at which military science is a prescribed part of the course of instruction and soldiers honorably discharged from the service of the United States may drill and parade with firearms in public.

109 posted on 06/07/2011 4:53:58 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right
...can a state still form a state militia?
The "militia" predates any government. The people themselves, with a few exceptions, are the militia. The State is only supposed to be in charge, generally, of appointing officers and ensuring folks are trained regularly.

What is the militia?

"Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom? Congress shall have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American ... The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the People." -- Tench Coxe - 1788.

110 posted on 06/07/2011 4:58:48 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

>Pardon this very basic question, but can a state still form a state militia?
>
>I don’t mean the National Guard. The Guard can be federalized at any time, so in reality the Guard is under a state’s control only if the fed’s don’t object.

Imagine how it would look [nationally] if the fed even tried to federalize the Guard in response to something like this: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2698298/posts


111 posted on 06/07/2011 5:04:36 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: HighlyOpinionated

Politicians will not solve this problem, I just knew that Ronald Reagan, would fix the border problem, after all he campaigned well on the issue, saying any country that can’t control their borders is not a country at all.

Oh well.......


112 posted on 06/07/2011 5:10:10 PM PDT by itsahoot (We make jokes, they make progress. Progressivism, Support Palin, or get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right
To help you "bone up" (learn).
select militia
113 posted on 06/07/2011 5:11:42 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
Why don't you check your own State's laws and find out for yourself!

Well, part of the value of asking questions on FR is that you usually get more than just the facts. You also get useful conservative opinion and commentary to go along with those facts.

Of course, you sometimes do get a smart-ass response, but that goes with the territory. Some folks just can't help being rude and that just has to be to overlooked.

114 posted on 06/07/2011 5:12:26 PM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I carrying this lantern? you ask. I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: cowpoke
The United States Constitution

Article IV

Section 4

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.


115 posted on 06/07/2011 5:19:46 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Some of us still 'hold these truths to be self-evident'..Enough to save the country? Time will tell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

“>Pardon this very basic question, but can a state still form a state militia?
>
>I don’t mean the National Guard. The Guard can be federalized at any time, so in reality the Guard is under a state’s control only if the fed’s don’t object.

Imagine how it would look [nationally] if the fed even tried to federalize the Guard in response to something like this: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2698298/posts

If the States do their job in carefully selecting the officers of the Guard as Article 1, Section 8, Clause 16. The guard will ignore Federal orders to mobilize under Federal Command when they conflict with State orders.

It is this job that is extremely critical that we have our State governments pay a great deal of care to attending to. At the end of the day this is the difference between life and death for the State. The first loyalty of the Militia officers must be to the State not Federal Government.

Any officer that does not hold their first loyalty to the State Must be demoted to a harmless position.

An army is a threat not an asset if it’s loyalty is not to your state.


116 posted on 06/07/2011 5:52:09 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

“Stock the Rio Grande with Nile crocodiles. They eat humans.”

The Rio Grande is of no aid to New Mexico as the Mexican border of New Mexico lays to the west of the Rio Grande river.


117 posted on 06/07/2011 6:18:39 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Vor Lady

All States have their own Militia, there is the Militia which the Feds pay them to keep(the National Guard) and various volunteer and state supported militia.

In terms of the National Guard our States Need to retake control of their guard units by aggressively asserting their rights to choose the officers and conduct the training.

Letting the Feds mobilize their own guards against them is a sign of sheer stupidity and fatal incompetents on the part of State officials.

The whole point of Article 1 Section 8 Clause 16 is as Alexander Hamilton put it in the Federalist papers(no. 29, 181—87):

“If it were possible seriously to indulge a jealousy of the militia upon any conceivable establishment under the Foederal Government, the circumstance of the officers being in the appointment of the States ought at once to extinguish it. There can be no doubt that this circumstance will always secure to them a preponderating influence over the militia.”


118 posted on 06/07/2011 6:27:04 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right
Some folks just can't help being rude and that just has to be to overlooked.
I try to be nice most of the time. I even warned you in advance.
Ignorance irks me, even my own.
119 posted on 06/07/2011 7:33:17 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
Look, I know you're not trying to be mean-spirited, but are you really saying that people should not ask factual questions on FR?

Such questions are asked on FR occasionally because questioners know that many folks here have personal experience with the subject at hand. I for one would rather hear about the “militia” concept from a Guardsman than from a dry Wikipeadia article.

And as you can tell, I did get a number of good thoughtful responses.

My personal area of expertise is applied physical science. If you ask a question relating to that, I would be happy to answer. And I would add whatever commentary that I thought you might find useful.

I certainly would not call you ignorant, and I would not belittle you for not going to some dry website instead.

120 posted on 06/07/2011 7:55:34 PM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I carrying this lantern? you ask. I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-179 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson