Yet the CDS’ers never propose a better alternative in someone who actually has the answers that Cain is honest in saying he doesn’t have.
for anyone who is interested, Mr. Cain has outlined his fundamental positions on a host of important issues which can be found at his website. there will come many appropriate times when he can articulate more detailed positions.
his work right now is to get voters acquainted with who he is and establish an organization. he has been smart enough to essentially avoid the gotcha questions being asked in interviews.
Cain hasn’t earned the right to have “Derangement Syndrome” after his name. There is no Cain Derangement Syndrome. Unless you think it’s deranged to have no idea who Herman Cain is, in which case, it’s common.
Bush Derangement Syndrome - check
Palin Derangement Syndrome - check
An article pointing out that Cain answers questions by saying that he’d look at the facts, which he doesn’t have, is not deranged at all, it’s pretty reasonable for anyone who is interested in finding out which way Cain was at least leaning in these cases. Certainly it benefits Cain by allowing him to avoid alienating people on either side of an issue. It’s not deranged to point this out.
Palin makes Cain look like a little child.
Thank you. Don’t know an answer? Admit you don’t know, then find out so that the next time you get that question you do have a plan in front of you.
Better to look like a fool by admitting ignorance than to remain a fool by feigning competence.
I like that Cain tells me, “I want to see the specifics of it before I comment on whether I am for or against this.”
We know where he stands on all the big deals. Why not on the little ones too? When I ran I got peppered by questions on an oil pipeline that I had never heard about at all. My response, “let me read up on the pipeline.” Next time I got that question, I could reply that I had read the particulars, knew the information and thought that the plan in place was solid.