When every state, every member of Congress and every court disagrees with your interpretation of the Constitution, then you are probably a nut.
///
simply not a fair statement. how many members of Congress are on record EITHER way?
how many of them, have stated they disagree with my
“interpretation of the Constitution”?
in fact, when Obama HIMSELF signed off on McCain’s eligibility, with other Senators, they were SUPPORTING my interpretation.
...most of them, don’t WANT to know the facts. most of them, don’t know the facts. they haven’t read the research i have, done by the sterling people i named in post #23.
your mention of the “Guam” congressmen, supports my position. there is no lack of cowardice and ignorance in Congress. that is why they are regarded so poorly by 99% of the American People.
(i suppose you believe Weiner, that he was hacked, and doesn’t know if that is his own photo of himself? you expect people like HIM, to defend the Constitution?)
and i listed just a FEW of the many things, that convince me, there IS a conspiracy. just the CT SSN ALONE, is proof.
not to mention Schussel’s clear dissection of the FORGED Selective Service form, the many many missing documents.
(like the SINGLE page missing out of the divorce papers?!?)
and these:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2720608/posts?page=23#23
http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=186343
...ignorance of the facts by the majority, does NOT make the minority, “nutjobs”.
remember the scientist who created the theory of continental drift? he was ridiculed by 99% of the world’s scientists, and died a broken man...
and Einstein himself was ridiculed, and told the majority of scientists were against him. he said, it didn’t require a majority. it only require one with facts.
and there ARE definitive facts, that support scrubbing, coverup, and forgery. his OWN autobiography (written by Ayers), has provably wrong facts. his hiding records, like college transcripts, that others like John Kerry and Bush showed, is yet more indication, he is hiding the truth.
the Governor of Hawaii is a clumsy liar. saying he say Obama at “T-ball” age. then later saying he saw him immediately after birth.
you probably don’t believe in evolution either. after all, there is no conclusive proof of that either. just a ton of supporting, interrelated FACTS.
NONE of which you address. like WHY did Obama Sr put on official state dept. documents from 1959 to 1962, his correct age, yet on the COLB and LFBC his age is incorrect, based on those official documents?
...instead, you respond that the congressman who thinks Guam could flip over, disagrees with me... and that makes ME a nutjob ?
“When every state, every member of Congress and every court disagrees with your interpretation of the Constitution, then you are probably a nut.
///
simply not a fair statement. how many members of Congress are on record EITHER way?”
IN January 2009, every Congressman had the right and obligation to raise an objection to the vote of the Electoral College. They did so in 2000 and in 2004, but NO MEMBER of Congress raised an objection. If a single Senator and a single Representative had objected, the matter would have gone up for debate and vote - but there was no objection. No one agreed with your belief that Obama Sr made Obama Jr ineligible. Your side got 0 out of 535.
Question: Why wasn’t natural born citizen explained in the body of the Constitution?
Answer (at least, my answer): Because it was such a simple concept that even an 18th century 6 year old understood it. So here’s my explaination of a natural born citizen that even a 6 year old could understand (much thanks to Denzel Washington in the movie, Philadelphia). It’s called the 3 scoops of vanilla ice cream explaination:
You have 3 scoops of vanilla ice cream. One scoop represents the citizen father, one scoop represents the citizen mother (of the same country) and the 3rd scoop represents the baby born IN the same country that the parents (plural) are citizens of. Mix all 3 scoops together and what flavor do you get? You get vanilla....naturally. If one of those scoops was a different flavor, say chocolate or strawberry, when you mixed them together you woud get something....unatural. It’s as easy as that so I guess that means that a 6 year old in the 1700’s was smarter than a 21st century adult (kudos to the liberal educational system).
But let’s not kid ourselves. Congress knows what a natural born citizen is. Both sides of the aisle have tried to pass laws to change it’s meaning without resorting to the amendment process. 2 months before SR511 was passed, the same cast of characters (Leahy, McCaskill, barky, Hillary, Coburn, Webb) tried to pass a bill ( S.2678 ) in order to help McCain. It didn’t pass so they migrated to a phoney senate resolution which meant nothing but was intended to decieve the electorate. It passed 99-0 but it was a lie. McCain was never born on the base (Coco Solo). He was born in a civilian hospital in Colon. They also lied when they mentioned the 1st Congress’s statute on natural born citizens without noting that that statute was recinded 5 years later to reflect citizen instead. They knew that the voting public for the most part is not well informed, so they took advantage of their ignorance. (By the way, even if McCain was born on Coco Solo, 7FAM 1113 states that: contrary to popular belief, U.S. military instalations overseas are NOT U.S. soil).
Both sides of the Senate produced this sham and allowed an ineligible John McCain to continue to run. The down side was that when barky became the standard bearer, Republicans couldn’t say a thing cause they lied for McCain (and still haven’t to this day). Even Hillary got slammed by barky and couldn’t challenge him so she sent one of her “people” to do it. One of the 1st if not THE 1st lawsuit to challenge barky came from Phillip Berg (a Hillary supporter....what a coincidence). The house got caught up in it at the electoral college certification vote on 8 Jan. Now, everyone’s in on it.
So... why are we in this mess now? 2 reasons: McCain’s vanity and Republican stupidity. I think that if McCain wasn’t involved, then Republican opposition to barky would have been much stronger. (Lay with dogs...you get fleas,eh?)
It’s my opinion that Republicans will not speak up (and they haven’t so far) because barky is just waiting to implicate them in McCain’s eligibility vote from SR 511 and of course, play the race card. It’s up to us to out these criminals, both R and D. Some of these rascals have migrated to the tea party for cover (Demint and Bachman to name two)