[muawiyah]

In the Indiana case the cops were on the premises at the request of the wife. She'd call 911 earlier and they arrived.

You don't need a warrant to answer a citizen's request for help.

Now, don't you feel ashamed, or are you some big john type Arab macho guy who thinks the rights of women don't count ~ BTW, the wife had every right to shoot the man who attacked the cops ~ under the Indiana Castle Doctrine Law, but she didn't. The cops merely tasered him and hauled him, but he attacked them.

[Longdriver]

In the Indiana case the cops were on the premises at the request of the wife. She'd call 911 earlier and they arrived. You don't need a warrant to answer a citizen's request for help. Now, don't you feel ashamed, *****************************

Why the Indiana case was heard is irrelevant. I'm not ashamed and your pathetic insult attempt was weak.

What IS relevant is the ruling that crapped on the 4th Amendment:
"In a 3-2 decision, Justice Steven David writing for the court said if a police officer wants to enter a home for any reason or no reason at all, a homeowner cannot do anything to block the officer's entry."


(ACTIVIST JUDGE ALERT!!!!)

David continues:

"We believe … a right to resist an unlawful police entry into a home is against public policy and is incompatible with modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence,"

"Incompatible with modern 4th Amendment jp"?? Rewriting the constitution to support the Police State is Incompatible with the Constitution itself. http://www.nwitimes.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/article_ec169697-a19e-525f-a532-81b3df229697.html

I'm sure you're NOT ashamed, ya jack-booted-thug-lover!!