Sheriff releases video of SWAT shooting into house of ex-Marine

KOLD News 13 Tucson ^ | 5/26/2011 | Michael Truelsen

[nparker99]

The Pima County Sheriff's Department released a video Thursday that shows a SWAT team shooting into a suspect's house. He died after being shot 60 times.

Jose Guerena, 26, was shot and killed May 5 when Pima County authorities served a search warrant on his home.

The Sheriff's department says five SWAT team members fired more than 70 rounds in less than 10 seconds after the former Marine pointed an assault rifle at officers. His wife contends the family thought the officers were robbers. He was shot 60 times

[TigersEye]

I think you’ve nailed it in both your last two posts. There is a definite pattern with the poster that you describe in #199 that I have seen for months and the pattern in #200 sure fits too.

[SeeSac]

That means you're just going to throw around a lot of implicit accusations, and keep dancing around actually stepping up and naming names. You came to me talking trash about other Freepers, but when it's time to get down to it, you fold up and start trying to change the subject.

See my posts to Tigerseye

[dragnet2]

Yep, I’ve noticed that too.

[tacticalogic]

See my posts to Tigerseye

Where is your post listing the names of the "pro-drug" Freepers?

[SeeSac]

Where is your post listing the names of the "pro-drug" Freepers?

I don't need to post a list. Two of them have come out posting to me!

[tacticalogic]

I don't need to post a list. Two of them have come out posting to me!

You won't post a list because you aren't willing to own up to it.

Making unsubstantiated accusations against unnamed forum members is a troll tactic used to sow discord and mistrust among the membership. Why are you doing it, and why should you be allowed to get away with it?

[SeeSac]

Making unsubstantiated accusations against unnamed forum members is a troll tactic used to sow discord and mistrust among the membership. Why are you doing it, and why should you be allowed to get away with it?

I don't have a list. You can't deny that there are pro-drug freepers, now can you since already two have posted back to me since this began.

[Vigilantcitizen]

Seems to be some kind of tag-team arrangement. One troll slips up and steps in it, and when called out runs off to different thread to start back up there, while aonther troll shows up to run inteference.

What you said.

[tacticalogic]

Then name them, and report them for abuse.

[SeeSac]

Then name them, and report them for abuse.

I didn't know it was 'abuse' to post pro-drug posts. Are you sure?

[tacticalogic]

Yep. I've seen a lot of stuff here in 12+ years, including a few people who openly advocated drug use. They were told that wasn't going to be tolerated on the forum. A few of them got banned when they didn't take the hint.

I've also seen a few who tried to argue that "pro-drug" means anything not sufficiently anti-drug to suit them, but I've never seen that fly.

[Ken H]

Many of us believe that the states should set their own drug policies under authority of the Tenth Amendment. Asking for the third time today:

Do you think the original Commerce Clause authorizes fedgov to impose national drug and alcohol prohibition... YES or NO?