[trisham]

Oh no. We should all follow what you think and totally disregard the Supreme Court. After all, you have demonstrated your deep knowledge of Constitutional history right here on this thread. Yeah, that's the ticket, ignore the Supreme Court because of some anonymous poster on a web forum. Grow up.

*************************************

It's your contention that the Supreme Court cannot err?

[little jeremiah]

It’s his contention that the SCOTUS cannot err when it suits his fancy.

Kind of like pictures of Chinese contortionists I’ve seen. You wonder - “How DO they do that???”

[Prokopton]

It's your contention that the Supreme Court cannot err?

I don't know why it's so hard to understand. There is no functional appeal to a Supreme Court decision. It makes little difference if they are in error or not, their decision is the law of the land. Not what Trisham thinks or what Prokopton thinks or what anyone else thinks. Millions of people think their decision of Roe v. Wade was wrong, but still millions of babies die every year.

To argue that Supreme Court decisions, like Everson v. Board of Education, are not important because, in your personal opinion, the Supreme Court did not follow the Constitution, is futile and unproductive. Until overturned, they are the law regardless of what you or anyone else thinks, wrong or right.

Cursing the darkness enlightens nothing.